Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
La misura  della   risposta all'impulso  per  la caratterizzazione  di  sistemi  acustici  e  vibrazionali
2
Time Line
3
The Past
4
Starting point: room impulse response
5
Traditional measurement methods
  • Pulsive sources: ballons, blank pistol
6
Example of a pulsive impulse response
7
Loudspeaker as sound source
  • A loudspeaker is fed with a special test signal x(t), while a microphone records the room response
  • A proper deconvolution technique is required for retrieving the impulse response h(t) from the recorded signal y(t)
8
Measurement process
  • The desidered result is the linear impulse response of the acoustic propagation h(t). It can be recovered by knowing the test signal x(t) and the measured system output y(t).
  • It is necessary to exclude the effect of the not-linear part K and of the background noise n(t).


9
Electroacoustical methods
  • Different types of test signals have been developed, providing good immunity to background noise and easy deconvolution of the impulse response:
    • MLS (Maximum Lenght Sequence, pseudo-random white noise)
    • TDS (Time Delay Spectrometry, which basically is simply a linear sine sweep, also known in Japan as “stretched pulse” and in Europe as “chirp”)
    • ESS (Exponential Sine Sweep)
  • Each of these test signals can be employed with different deconvolution techniques, resulting in a number of “different” measurement methods
  • Due to theoretical and practical considerations, the preference is nowadays generally oriented for the usage of ESS with not-circular deconvolution


10
The first MLS apparatus - MLSSA
  • MLSSA was the first apparatus for measuring impulse responses with MLS
11
More recently - the CLIO system
  • The Italian-made CLIO system has superseded MLSSA for most low-cost electroacoustics applications (measurement of loudspeakers, quality control)
12
The first TDS apparatus - TEF
  • Techron TEF 10 was the first apparatus for measuring impulse responses with TDS
  • Subsequent versions (TEF 20, TEF 25) also support MLS
13
Theory of MLS method
  • X(t) is a periodic binary signal obtained with a suitable shift-register, configured for maximum lenght of the period.


14
MLS deconvolution
  • The re-recorded signal y(i) is cross-correlated with the excitation signal thanks to a fast Hadamard transform. The result is the required impulse response h(i), if the system was linear and time-invariant
15
MLS example
16
MLS example
17
Example of a MLS impulse response
18
The Present
19
Today’s Hardware: PC and audio interface
20
Hardware: loudspeaker & microphone
21
The first ESS system - AURORA
22
Exponential Sine Sweep method
  •  x(t) is a band-limited sinusoidal sweep signal, which frequency is varied exponentially with time, starting at f1 and ending at f2.
23
Test Signal – x(t)
24
Measured signal - y(t)
  • The not-linear behaviour of the loudspeaker causes many harmonics to appear
25
Inverse Filter – z(t)
  • The deconvolution of the IR is obtained convolving the measured signal y(t) with the inverse filter z(t) [equalized, time-reversed x(t)]
26
Deconvolution of Exponential Sine Sweep
  • The “time reversal mirror” technique is employed: the system’s impulse response is obtained by convolving the measured signal y(t) with the time-reversal of the test signal x(-t). As the log sine sweep does not have a “white” spectrum, proper equalization is required


27
Deconvolution = rotation of the sonograph
  • Convolving with the inverse filter rotates the time-log(f) plane counter clockwise
28
Result of the deconvolution
  • The last impulse response is the linear one, the preceding are the harmonics distortion products of various orders
29
IR Selection
  • After the sequence of impulse responses has been obtained, it is possible to select and insulate just one of them:
30
Maximum Length Sequence vs. Exp. Sine Sweep
31
Example of an ESS impulse response
32
Post processing of impulse responses
  • A special plugin has been developed for the computation of STI according to IEC-EN 60268-16:2003
33
The STI Method
34
MTF from Impulse Response
  • It is possible to derive the MTF values from a single impulse response measurement:
35
Background noise
  • If the background noise is superposed to the impulse response, the previous method already takes care of it, and the MTF values are measured correctly
  • However, in some cases, it is advisable to perform a noise-free measurement of the IR, and then insert the effect of the noise with the following expression:
36
Post processing of impulse responses
  • A special plugin has been developed for performing analysis of acoustical parameters according to ISO-3382
37
The new AQT plugin for Audition
  • The new module is still under development and will allow for very fast computation of the AQT (Dynamic Frequency Response) curve from within Adobe Audition
38
Distortion measurements
  • A headphone was driven with a 1 V RMS signal, causing severe distortion in the small loudspeaker.


  • The measurement was made placing the headphone on a dummy head.


  • Measurements: ESS and traditional sine at 1 kHz


39
Distortion measurements
  • Comparison between:
  •  traditional distortion measurement with fixed-frequency sine (the black histogram)
  • the new exponential sweep (the 4 narrow, coloured lines)


40
Spatial analysis by directive impulse responses
  • The initial approach was to use directive microphones for gathering some information about the spatial properties of the sound field “as perceived by the listener”
  • Two apparently different approaches emerged: binaural dummy heads and pressure-velocity microphones:


41
IACC “objective” spatial parameter
  • It was attempted to “quantify” the “spatiality” of a room by means of “objective” parameters, based on 2-channels impulse responses measured with directive microphones
  • The most famous “spatial” parameter is IACC (Inter Aural Cross Correlation), based on binaural IR measurements


42
Lateral Fraction (LF) spatial parameter
  • Another “spatial” parameter is the Lateral Fraction LF
  • This is defined from a 2-channels impulse response, the first channel is a standard omni microphone, the second channel is a “figure-of-eight” microphone:



43
Are binaural measurents reproducible?
  • Experiment performed in anechoic room - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 5 binaural dummy heads
44
Are IACC measurents reproducible?
  • Diffuse field - huge difference among the 4 dummy heads
45
Are LF measurents reproducible?
  • Experiment performed in the Auditorium of Parma - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 4 pressure-velocity microphones
46
Are LF measurents reproducible?
  • At 25 m distance, the scatter is really big
47
3D Impulse Response (Gerzon, 1975)
48
3D extension of the pressure-velocity measurements
  • The Soundfield microphone allows for simultaneous measurements of the omnidirectional pressure and of the three cartesian components of particle velocity (figure-of-8 patterns)
49
Directivity of transducers
50
A-format microphone arrays
  • Today several alternatives to Soundfield microphones do exists. All of them are providing “raw” signals from the 4 capsules, and the conversion from these signals (A-format) to the standard Ambisonic signals (B-format) is performed digitally by means of software running on the computer
51
The Waves project (2003)
  • The original idea of Michael Gerzon was finally put in practice in 2003, thanks to the Israeli-based company WAVES
  • More than 50 theatres all around the world were measured, capturing 3D IRs (4-channels B-format with a Soundfield microphone)
  • The measurments did also include binaural impulse responses, and a circular-array of microphone positions
  • More details on WWW.ACOUSTICS.NET


52
The Ciresa project (2005)
  • Measurements of the vibrations and radiated sound from wood panels
  • Mapping of harmonic tables by means on an XY scanner
  • Pressure measured by means of a linear microphone array
  • Velocity measured by means of a laser vibrometer


53
Conclusions
  • The sine sweep method revealed to be systematically superior to the MLS & TDS methods for measuring electroacoustical impulse responses
  • The ESS method also allows for measurement of not-linear devices and to assess harmonic distortion
  • Current limitation for spatial analysis in room acoustis is due to transducers (loudspeakers and microphones)
  • A new generation of loudspeakers and microphones, made of massive arrays, is under development.
  • The “harmonic orders” impulse responses obtained by the exponential sine sweep method can be used for not-linear convolution, which yields more realistic auralization